Why The Mainstream Media Can’t Be Trusted To Vet Communists, Globalists and Democrats

ELDER PATRIOT – The mainstream media is relentless in its pursuit of finding dirt on Republican candidates, or in trying to stir up controversy between the candidates with the intentions of starting an intra-party food fight. 

Nothing better illustrates the mission of the Rockefeller Mediacracy than what the New York Times did in 2008.  The day after endorsing John McCain for the Republican nomination they ran a story alleging McCain was having an affair with a lobbyist.  This would’ve been perfectly proper if it were a new story.  It wasn’t.  The story was almost a decade old and had been debunked by…the New York Times, itself at the time.

By contrast the toughest interview candidate Obama had was by Joe the Plumber.  The mainstream media (including Bill O’reilly) asked no follow-up questions inquiring just what he meant by wanting to “fundamentally transform America.”  His past associations with known terrorists?  Not worth asking about.  His grades at Columbia?  Who cares?  The two sexual harassment lawsuits Harvard settled with male students on Obama’s behalf while editor of the Law Review?  Of no interest.  Numerous accounts of Obama cruising Chicago’s steam baths and gay bars or documenting his drug use?  Nothing to see here.  His relationship with communist Frank Davis Marshall during his formative years who was at least his surrogate father if not his biological one?  Why would you ask such a foolish question?

Let me be perfectly clear, while many of the questions posed to Republican candidates by the MSM are unnecessarily snarky and unprofessional, I am fine with the media giving proctologic exams to Republican candidates.  I want to know who they are and what they’ve done before I consider voting for them.  But, that goes for all of the nominees and that just isn’t going to happen.    

The coronation of Hillary Clinton is almost over and I’m still waiting for some probing questions such as:

Given the current turmoil in the Middle East that you were the architect of while serving as Secretary of State are you willing to admit the death and violence we are witnessing is your fault?

Do you now regret funding ISIS?

There are rumors that the night of the attack on our embassy in Benghazi massive amounts of weapons were being transferred, by agents under your direction, to Islamic extremists.  Are you willing to disavow there is any truth to those rumors?

President Obama continues to refuse to protect our borders and is significantly increasing the number of military-aged Syrian refugees to the United States.  Are these policies that you plan on continuing?

Recently Kathleen Willey and Juanita Broaddrick came forward to remind the world that your husband is a serial sexual predator after you released a short video of yourself with this message; “I want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault.  Don’t let anyone silence your voice. You have a right to be heard, and you have a right to be believed.”  In light of that, what do you have to say to them and Paula Jones, Eileen Wellstone, Carolyn Moffet, Elizabeth Ward, Paula Corbin, Sandra Allen James, Christy Zercher, as well as the dozens of others who have refused to give their names to the police for fear of reprisal from you?

You recently affirmed your decision to bailout Wall Street after 9/11.  In light of the fact that the large banks and large-cap corporations were the recipients of trillions of dollars of the peoples’ money and are stronger than ever while increasingly segments of the middle class are dropping into the lower class, what do you have to say to the people now?

These are six simple and legitimate questions for the Democrat nominee.  Don’t hold your breath waiting to hear them asked.

Loading Facebook Comments ...