EVERY SINGLE DAY MEN AND WOMEN WHO HAVE NEVER MET YOU RISK NEVER SEEING THEIR FAMILIES AGAIN SO THAT YOU CAN LIVE FREE HERE AT HOME. LET THAT SINK IN AS YOU READ THIS AWESOME STORY …
AWM| United States citizens are cheering on the 500 troops who were recently deployed to Syria on a mission to deter aggression and keep the focus on defeating ISIS.
And that is pretty crummy news for ISIS, who has recently lost control of all territory along the Turkey-Syria border.
As you can see in the images below, the area was taken over by American flags and the pride of citizens to go along with it. These convoys were seen on the outskirts of the Syrian city of Manbij, near the village of Yalanli and there is no denying that they are locked and loaded and ready to defeat the most successful militant group ever. ISIS has seized enormous amounts of Iraq and Syria and has declared itself a state and governing territory for several years now.
Beginning in Iraq in 2004, it was originally known as al Qaeda, but over time the group changed themselves to ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria) and served as an ally to Osama bin Laden’s al Qaeda. Both groups are one in the same as they are extreme radical anti-Western militant groups that are dedicated to forming an independent Islamic state in the region.
ISIS has proven to be even more hardcore and better established than al Qaeda, as they have been efficient and successful in controlling and seizing territory. In order to run their operation smoothly, the group put governing structures in place, also known as the ISIS’ bureaucratic hierarchy. When it comes to the government structure, it’s really not a whole lot different than the Western countries that it despises…you just need to take away the democracy and add in ruthless terrorism.
One of the other reasons why ISIS was such a success, is due to the fact that its force spread fast and the territories were captured with efficiency. In 2014 ISIS was officially declared as a caliphate, which is known as a state that is governed by an Islamic leader. A large source of the income for the group is from oil fields, which was said to make them up to $3 million each day.
But, it looks like the group is slowly being forced out of controlling the territory, and it has lost 12% of its territory so far. With the recent push of US troops, backers are hopeful that the will be completely withdrawn from the picture soon enough. READ MORE
IF YOU SUPPORT THE BRAVE MEN AND WOMEN OVERSEAS RISKING THEIR LIFE AND LIMB TO MAKE SURE YOU CAN LIVE FREE BACK HERE AT HOME PLEASE TAKE A SECOND TO HONOR THEM BY LETTING AMERICA KNOW THEY STORY!
HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP
“Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance.
Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn.
Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.”
Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump.
Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon.
“Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.”
Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday.
The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.”
But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why?
At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime.
“The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained:
For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code.
However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct.
A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.”
However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him.
. Obama’s Iran nuke deal
Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server
Obama IRS targets conservatives
Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters
Obamacare & Obama’s false promises
Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order
Benghazi-gate
Operation Fast & Furious
5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl
Extortion 17
‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session
Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval
Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law
Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act
Illegally conducting war against Libya
NSA: Spying on Americans
Muslim Brotherhood ties
Miriam Carey
Birth certificate
Executive orders
Solyndra and the lost $535 million
Egypt
Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress
Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers
Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’