MOTHER HAS CHILD TAKEN AWAY BECAUSE SHE BELIEVES IN THE CHEMTRAIL CONSPIRACY

ROMNEY WORDSWORTH- A judge in Colorado has ordered a child removed from her mother’s care because the mother believes in “chemtrails”.  The judge called it a “fringe subculture” that represented a threat to her daughter.

Boulder Judge Dolores Mallard told resident Becca Vandb that her belief in the chemtrail conspiracy – that aerosol trails emitted by commercial and military aircraft are in fact part of clandestine geoengineering program – was a radical view because “99% of people would know those are just contrails.”

Vandb said that the inquiry was triggered after she raised the subject of chemtrails during a visit to her daughter’s school and was immediately told to leave the premises.

“I can now only see my daughter with a social security worker standing over me taking notes, and the judge said this was so that if I mention chemtrails they would put a stop to that. I am being railroaded for expressing my views about chemtrails,” wrote Vandb, adding that she had not received any CPS visits nor were there any allegations of child abuse made by the court or her daughter’s school.

According to Judge Mallard, Vandb being “immersed in a fringe subculture” means “she is a danger to her daughter.”  Her daughter is already a pre-teen.  The Judge’s contention that her mother’s political beliefs are somehow a “danger” to her daughter is nothing short of an assault on the Bill of Rights, and our freedom.

Whether you believe in the reality of chemtrails or not, this is a chilling act of Tyranny.  This represents the State punishing an individual by taking away their child, solely because of their political beliefs.  Will the government next start taking away the children of those who don’t believe in Global Warming?

The government officially denies it is spraying the country with chemtrails, but there is actually solid evidence to the contrary.

Go read the Space & Preservation Act of 2001. In this document the United States Government openly admits the existence of Chemtrails and weather control weapons.  An article from USA Today from Feb 25th, 2011 titled “Can Geoengineering put the freeze on global warming?” admits that Chemtrails and Geoengineering exist, but it’s done to protect us from Global Warming.

There are patents for these very things. On record with the U.S. Patent Office from December 5th, 2010: Spraying the Skies: 1975 U.S. Patent for Powder Contrail Generation. Some of these patents date back all the way to March 1st, 1927.

There is an ongoing lawsuit in Canada to expose and halt the chemical spraying.  It has been brought by the non profit Stop Geoengineering Legal Defense Fund.

Once these chemicals are sprayed, several hours later they descend several hours later to the ground where people are exposed to these toxins.  The toxins seep into the soil and water and eventually into plant life as well.  This eventually affects the food chain.

So, what is “The Law”?  Did the Judge follow “The Law” in this case?  Of course not!  The Law in America states that absent actual physical or emotional abuse of a child, the State has no right to take a child from a parent.  The First Amendment guarantees freedom of speech and religion, which covers political beliefs and even belief in conspiracies.  But in this case, the Judge and the whole Government System took a child away from a mother based solely on her political beliefs.  The idea that those political beliefs caused some sort of “harm” (unspecified and unquantified, naturally) to the child was a legal conclusion reached by the Judge without any proofs.  And if we are about to say that a parent’s political beliefs can cause “harm” to a child, they where does that road end?  It ends in Fascism and the end of the First Amendment, of course.

I’m a lawyer, and I’ve quit the practice of law. There’s no point in being a lawyer anymore when we are no longer a Nation of Laws. The “Law”, such as it is, is whatever powerful bureaucrats and Judges declare it is, as this case illustrates. Notice how the State will ignore and fail to follow the law when it gets in the way of their agenda. Hiring a lawyer to point out that the law has not been followed will not get you anywhere anymore. The entire Judiciary has been corrupted, just as all our other institutions have been. A Judge is just a political appointee who got the job in the first place by being a good donor/fundraiser to the political party who appointed him/her or backed their election campaign. They are not neutral guardians of the law-they are political hacks and “fixers” who move the agenda of the Elites along. Look at how the Supreme Court operates nowadays. The fish rots from the head down. The politicization of Judges goes all the way down to the Municipal level.

We are no longer a Nation of Laws. The laws are malleable and like shifting sand. They mean whatever the Ruling Class want them to mean, and they ignore with aplomb any old laws that get in their way. The Constitution is supposed to be the Supreme Law of the Land. In practice, it is over-ruled and nullified routinely by Federal and State statute, local ordinance (1st and 2nd Amendment) and even College Codes of Conduct (1st, 2nd, 4th Amendment).

What to do if they come to take our children? I know many of the Keyboard Kommandoes you see in the comments section of various online forums will write:  “shoot anyone who tries.” But we have to think beyond that moment of impassioned rage that we would all feel. The next people at your door would be a SWAT team that would likely shoot you in front of your children or imprison you and throw away the key. In either scenario the children get taken by the State and you lose.

If you can’t leave the U.S., your next best option is to home school your kids.  It is the interaction with the public schools that most often leads to state interventions that lead to the State abducting children in order to punish the political beliefs of parents.  This is exactly what happened to Becca Vandb.